Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

öÍΡ X àÊ õÉ篿¡ À־ ü´íº ÓßÇÑ ù¬øí°ú ÛÁåÝ¿¡ μÇÑ æÚϼ

Study Of Patient Exposure And Protection From Dental Radiography

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1979³â 9±Ç 1È£ p.25 ~ 31
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÅ¿ø(ÚÓ÷ºê¹)/Tae Won Park

Abstract

îÊíº´Â ü´íº¿¡ ÓßÇÑ ù¬øíÌîÊõ°ú ÛÁåÝ¿¡ ÓßÇÑ Ñ¦æöÀ» ü¬Ø¡ÇÒ ÙÍîÜÀ¸·Î æðû«ÎÃàÊÕáͪ ¹×
papintecÀ» ì¦éÄÇÏ¿© â©ïÜô÷ ¹× Ë£ßÒàÍ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ àÊÕá°ú ÍöñéߤկàÊÀ» ö´ïÒÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº
Ì¿Íý¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ÞÅéÄ XÒÑ Û¡ßæíûöÇÀÇ ÚâʤöµÀ» ö´ïÒ(1.44mm A1)ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. ñ§ö° ß¾äÉÓÞÏ¿öÍ õÉç¯ãÁ phantom¿¡¼­ ö´ïÒµÈ ñ§éÓö° â©ïÜô÷ ¹× Ë£ßÒàÍÝ»ÀÇ àÊÕáÀº ÊÀ
ÊÀ8.9, 1.2, 2.8mRÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, ÔÒìéÇÑ ðÉËì¿¡¼­ Phantom¿¡¼­ îñÛ°ÀÇ 84¥ìR, ý­Û°¿¡¼­ 11¥ìR,
éÓö°¿¡¼­ 18¥ìR ±×¸®°í, ñ§ö°Àº 72¥ìRÀÇ ÝÂøÖ¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù
3. ÔÒìéðÉËì¿¡¼­µµ ù¬ÞÐô÷°¡ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì, ȤÀº ¾ø´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ µû¶ó å³ 5%ÀÇ àÊåÖ ó¬×並 ³ª
Ÿ³Â´Ù.

The utilization of x-ray for diagnosis and examination is increasing by about 5¡­15%
every year, therefore, it would be mandatory to protect the patients from exposures and
so, studios in this field are performed even now.
In dental field, the area of irradiation is limited any to the head and neck area, but
the irradiated angle is varied following the objected tooth, so the adjacent structures
lens and thyroid gland thyroid be fragile to radiation. And the scattered radiation is one
of the complicated problems in the protection because of specificity of dental x-ray and
its object structures.
The author, by using TLD(Thermoluminescent Dosimeter; Teledyne Isotopes- Model
7300, Element; TLD 200 (CaF2:Dy) and Capintec(Capintec Model 192,
PM-30 Diagnostic chamber 28ml active volume), tried a measurement of air dose
distribution of the scattered radiation and the irradiated dose of lens and thyroid gland
under the condition of taking the film on the left maxillary molar.
The results were as follows :
1. The half value layer of adapted dental K-ray machine was measured, and is 1,44§®
A1.
2. The time of irradiation on the left maxillary in the Alderson Rando Phantom, the
measured doses of left and right lens, and thyroid gland were 8.9 mR, 1.2 mR and 2.8
mR. Under the same conditions, the scattered radiation at the distance of 1 meter from
the phantom were 84 ¥ìR at the front side, 11 ¥ìR at the bach side, 18 ¥ìR at the right
side and 72 ¥ìR at the left side.
3. Under the same conditions, the dose showed higher value by about 5% in the
presence of object(phantom) than in the case of absence.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸